Thursday, 30th September 2010
Howzit
You would have thought that Zuma, of all people, would have had a front row seat to the duplicity of Robert Mugabe and would have raised the concerns he had with SADC, but no, rather than attempt to work out the problems in Zimbabwe using the regional body and his mediation position, he has opted to call for the lifting of sanctions instead.
Zuma should have the misnomer of mediator removed and SADC should give it to someone who might actually do something with it.
Zuma has failed the people of Zimbabwe, SADC and his own country with his biased actions.
"South African President Jacob Zuma will this week urge the European Union to lift targeted sanctions on members of the Mugabe regime. Zuma is attending an EU-South Africa summit in Brussels, Belgium and according to Foreign Affairs spokesperson Saul Kgomotso Molobi, "South Africa will set out the AU position, which calls for the lifting of sanctions on Zimbabwe."
South Africa played a key role in cobbling together the half-baked power sharing deal in Zimbabwe, after Mugabe and his ZANU PF party lost elections in March 2008. The Joint Operations Command which groups together all arms of state security had by then led a murderous campaign of retribution to punish mostly rural voters who voted for Morgan Tsvangirai and his MDC-T party.
Mugabe has however refused to honour the same agreement that offered him a lifeline and has instead hid behind the targeted sanctions as an excuse for the lack of progress in the country, demanding they be lifted first. This week a delegation from the coalition government met US politicians in a futile attempt to get that country to remove similar measures. The US said although it recognized the economic advances made, there was no progress on the political front in terms of respect for human and property rights.
The US said the, "current political and human rights environment in Zimbabwe remained troublesome", pointing to the recent harassment of WOZA and the disruption of constitutional reform meetings in Harare. The United States said that Zimbabwe must make further progress before the targeted sanctions would be removed, stating that, "political progress comes with strong institutions, not strong individuals, and developing strong and transparent institutions will sustain economic growth"."
Mugabe has a very bad habit of attempting to hoodwink the entire world that the restrictive measures in place are 'illegal economic' sanctions when the sanctions in place are 'targeted travel' measures and are, more often than not, lifted to allow Mugabe and huge delegations to travel the world.
Mugabe claims that the 'sanctions' have caused poverty and economic decline in Zimbabwe, but at no time has he substantiated these claims. He is probably one of the wealthiest people in Africa, but does nothing for the people he purportedly leads.
"Zuma is also likely to leave the EU-South Africa summit empty-handed over his sanctions removal request. Germany’s Ambassador to Zimbabwe, Albrecht Conze, recently made it clear saying; "There are strictly no restrictions on trade with Zimbabwe, investment in Zimbabwe or on foreign banks lending money to Zimbabwe." The EU is likely to restate the same message and also point to the many millions of dollars it has committed in humanitarian aid to Zimbabwe."
"South Africa has been accused of "acquiescing" whilst people in Zimbabwe starved, during a hearing with the country's president, Jacob Zuma.
The attack was made by British Conservative MEP Geoffrey Van Orden, as the president appeared in front of the European Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee on 29 September 2010.
However President Zuma - who replaced Thabo Mbeki in March 2010 - defended his country's record.
He told MEPs that South Africa "gave leadership before anyone else did", and claimed the country had forced Robert Mugabe to tighten specific clauses in Zimbabwe's constitution, such as on vote counting.
He also urged the international community to lift sanctions to enable the South African Development Community (SADC) to do more to help Zimbabweans."
If I had the opportunity, I would request that Zuma explain just how South Africa has tightened Mugabe's habit of rigging elections and vote counting.
After the first round of the Presidential election in 2008, Mugabe's ZANU PF party seized the ballow boxes and spirited them away for five weeks, only for them to report back after that period that Mugabe had lost to Tsvangirai, but not be the magical 50% plus one vote that he needed to win.
Zuma would probably shrug his shoulders and say that it wasn't during his tenure in office. Would that make Mugabe's mechanisations in rigging elections acceptable?
I wrote that this practise is illegal and should be met with criminal charge.
And, it would appear, that the MDC agree with me...
"The MDC is strongly disturbed that Jabulani Sibanda, a self-styled war veteran, can cause so much suffering in Masvingo province during the past three months without any restraint from the police. It is common cause that Sibanda, with a team of 15 of Zimbabwe's most violent war veterans, is preaching hate, intimidating and dividing the people, inciteing violence and disturbing peace by forcing people to attend his meetings in the province.
Today, Sibanda disrupted classes at Nhema Primary School when he ordered teachers and school children to his rally before proceeding to Fuve Business Centre in Zaka, Masvingo province, where he threatened hundreds of villagers with violence if they stayed away from his meetings in the area."
When I was in the ZRP, threatening anyone with violence was a criminal offence. Perhaps the laws have been rewritten in Zimbabwe since then...
Farmers across the country have turned to Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai to put a stop to ongoing land attacks, which have continued regardless of his presence in the unity government. But the pleas appear to have fallen on deaf ears, and the situation is once again beginning to take an ugly turn.
Catherine Jouineau-Meredith's Twyford Farm was burned to the ground earlier this month by the ZANU PF senator who has led violent attacks on the property since last year, claiming he has an 'Offer Letter' for the property. Senator Jamaya Muduvuri moved on to the farm in March this year after successfully evicting Jouineau-Meredith, who was ordered to leave the farm and fined US$200 for occupying it "illegally"."
Contrary to Mugabe's policy of limiting the farm ownerships to 'one farm - one family' Muduvuri owns other farms in the country - but somehow this is overlooked. In addition, to what end is the destruction of Twyford farm? What has the Senator achieved? Why destroy something in order to take over ownership?
This is typical Mugabe. He tells the world one thing, whilst, on the ground in Zimbabwe, an entirely different fact is happening. And yet he would have the world believe that the country cannot feed itself because of Western sanctions...
"Muduvuri already owns Shiloh Farm near Kadoma, Mandalay and Brunswick farms near Chegutu, and Hoffmarie Farm in Kadoma, clearly demonstrating that the land grab has nothing to do with 'land reform'. Twyford farm is now the fifth property that he has grabbed to add to his collection of unproductive pieces of land.
"Senator Muduvuri has already looted the once productive farm of all its crops and equipment, and Jouineau-Meredith has repeatedly called on Prime Minister Tsvangirai to intervene over the past year. In March this year, Tsvangirai's office told Jouineau-Meredith to "disengage in Chegutu," and not try to recover her farm equipment and the rest of her belongings. She was assured that a letter cancelling Muduvuri's Offer Letter had been signed by the Prime Minister and Vice President John Nkomo. But after several attempts to get the letter, the Prime Minister's office stopped communicating with her and refused to return her calls.
Jouineau-Meredith wrote another letter to the Prime Minister's office last week expressing anger that there has been nothing but empty promises in reaction to her plight.
"I am now seeking FULL COMPENSATION for the loss of my French BIPPA farm as per the Land Reform Legislation regarding BIPPA farms. The farm represents a FRENCH INVESTMENT in Zimbabwe and is therefore liable for compensation in EURO the day it was taken away from me," Jouineau-Meredith wrote.
Deon Theron, the President of the Commercial Farmers Union (CFU), told SW Radio Africa on Wednesday that the situation "is returning to the old ways when the land reform programme started." He explained that he is also under threat, again, after already losing three farms since 2000. Theron has been living with his mother Hester, who was last year threatened with a jail term for refusing to leave her dairy farm and home of 50 years. The elderly widow was eventually granted a court interdict that stopped her eviction and was meant to protect her from the 'beneficiary' of her property.
But Theron said that the harassment against him and his mother has intensified despite the court order, and they are now locked out of their home. Theron explained that land invaders, assisted by the police, have managed to break into their home on the farm and lock the family out. The CFU president said that although he has limited access to the farm, land invaders have taken over and even the police have been involved."
And, if the police are called, they hide behind the 'it is political' excuse.
The landgrab, apart from decimating food production in Zimbabwe, has seen commercial farmers and their workers murdered - but we do not see anyone being arraigned in court, even though, in some cases, the perpetrator is known and named.
"It is a very scary, tragic situation, and it can only spell out bad things for the future of this country," Theron said. "There is no respect for international BIPPAs, no respect for our own courts, and as long as we don't have respect for the rule of law, then we are lost."
"Lawyers representing High Court judge Justice Chinembiri Bhunu in a case in which he is suing MDC-T treasurer Mr Roy Bennett for defamation say the white former commercial farmer has gone into hiding.
Justice Bhunu has filed a US$1 million defamation lawsuit against Bennett over 'distasteful' remarks he reported made in the media against the judge."
Is no one allowed an opinion in Zimbabwe? Yes, Bhunu may have acquitted Bennet (which the State is appealling and judement has now been indefinitiely reserved) but does he have to seek some sort of restitution for that decision? I find it very difficult to understand just ho Bhunu has been able to quantify the 'defamation' in monetary terms - it's not like Bennett's views are going to change his mindset, or that of others, is it?
"Sources from the law firm said efforts to personally serve Mr Bennett since last Friday were proving fruitless as he is reportedly overseas."
Just how they translate being out of the country to being in hiding, I don't know. I must have been absent they day that they changed the interpretation of that.
'debvhu





















Union Jack (1963 - 64, 1998 - ??)































